bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 14:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 396
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 31% Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.28.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 159 170 195 187 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 377
Write 236
Mixed 268
SusWrite 181
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 31.4
113% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 139
136% 215 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
196GB free
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 441 434 438 419 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 454
Mixed 335
SusWrite 435
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 32.2
114% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 162
175% 292 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
834GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 104 103 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 121
Write 92.4
Mixed 63
SusWrite 104
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5A384758334D32413136303043392020 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback