Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160225
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '19 at 12:56
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 93 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 328 46% 337 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 36D6) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.28 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 2.17 2% 2.45 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 794GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 87 125 162 164 161 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 172 Write 86.7 Mixed 139 SusWrite 123 97% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 109%
ASMT 2115 1TB 4,577 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 842GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 189 187 187 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 188 Write 177 Mixed 84 SusWrite 187 212% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 0467 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.1% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 15 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	119x
Core i3-4170Intel $20Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	33x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 52%, 50 samples	15x
99U5584-005.A00LF 0467 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GBKingstonBench 58%, 49 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $362

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16