Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R3.0  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 14:21
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 366
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 36D6) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.46 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 44 71 129 126 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 169
Write 173
Mixed 124
SusWrite 91.1
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 109%
ASMT 2115 1TB
842GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 187 187 187 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 188
Write 181
Mixed 86
SusWrite 187
214% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 0467 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback