Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 12:18
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 491
46% 383 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1618 MHz, MLim: 1827 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 68.5
58% 72.7 fps
MRender 79.7
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 62.7
57% 70.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 126 129 135 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 293
Write 175
Mixed 175
SusWrite 130
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 29.1
107% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 108
77% 93.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 122%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 134 133 131 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 132
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
646GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 123 123 122 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 59
SusWrite 121
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
618GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 95 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 94.2
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
191GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 70
Write 51
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 80.3
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-009.A00LF 99U5471-057.A00LF 99U5458-009.A00LF 99U5471-057.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback