Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '18 at 22:51
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 47 2-Core 94.4 49% 74.4 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 179 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 32.4 Reflection 33.4 Parallax 46.2 26% 37.3 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 34.1 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 155 125 121 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 418 Write 235 Mixed 262 SusWrite 139 58% 264 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 45.3 144% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38.7 DQ Write 4.1 DQ Mixed 43 26% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 128%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 111GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 104 88 94 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 288 Write 143 Mixed 158 SusWrite 97.2 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 58.5 4K Mixed 32.6 118% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 75.2 77% 126 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 88%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 102GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 60 55 59 58 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 58.9 Write 77.9 Mixed 43 SusWrite 57.7 44% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 44%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 609GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 110 93 105 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 109 Write 104 Mixed 64 SusWrite 104 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 86%
ST 8GB 8GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free, PID 0000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 8 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 12.6 12% 8.88 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-009.A00LF 99U5471-057.A00LF 99U5458-009.A00LF 99U5471-057.A00LF 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.1 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.7 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16