Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 03:18
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 858
82% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,307
81% 1,307 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
745GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 478 480 480 479 479 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 474
Mixed 456
SusWrite 480
108% 478 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 55.6
182% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
36GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,354
Write 1,163
Mixed 629
232% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 54.7
231% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 692
632% 962 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Enmotus T00 FuzeDrive 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 150 157 153 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HUH728080ALE601 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: A4GNV7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 197 202 200 182 199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 162
Mixed 72
SusWrite 197
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.3
166% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3334 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 41.5
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 35.9
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 116%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback