Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K6  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 02:05
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 266
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 795
83% 664 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 189
Parallax 193
149% 189 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 184
Splatting 128
118% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 262 242 195 255 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 772
Mixed 774
SusWrite 235
154% 688 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 51.6
185% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 745
519% 661 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 138%
Great: 141%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
44GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 290 291 291 291 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 368
Mixed 326
SusWrite 291
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 52.5
163% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 248
186% 250 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
129GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 78 79 78 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 88.5
Write 80.1
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 77.9
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 116 122 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 120
Write 142
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 122
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 89%
SanDisk CF SDDR-189 32GB
11GB free, PID b7bd
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 21.8
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 22.1
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
130% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 28.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 30.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback