Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Gaming K6  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 18 '19 at 23:28
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 101
2-Core 298
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 846
88% 707 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 181
Reflection 189
Parallax 191
147% 187 fps
Gravity 182
Splatting 125
132% 153 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 163 136 118 122 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 910
Write 332
Mixed 339
SusWrite 149
95% 433 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 34.2
153% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 404
338% 504 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 116%
Great: 141%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
44GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 257 288 268 279 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 352
Write 371
Mixed 306
SusWrite 275
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 45.6
157% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 248
186% 249 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
129GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 83 85 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 65.7
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 83.2
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 155
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 143
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 89%
SanDisk CF SDDR-189 32GB
11GB free, PID b7bd
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 31
Write 19.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 21.9
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
73% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2267 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback