Asrock Z97 Extreme9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 23:49
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 42.3
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 58
26% 41.1 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 375
30% 261 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84A6) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 19.5
16% 18.6 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.6
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 138 111 147 157 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 178
Write 170
Mixed 29
SusWrite 135
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
856GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 165 177 173 181 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 106
Write 180
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 169
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79%
Great: 107%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
738GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 135 137 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 140
Write 139
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 134
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
981GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 112
Mixed 71.8
70% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MMXIV 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback