Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 692
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1267) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 67.3
58% 70.6 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 68.4
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 75 8.2 3.5 80 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 412
Write 328
Mixed 248
SusWrite 74.6
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 11.9
51% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 13.2
12% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 55%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 113 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67% Good
Read 119
Write 101
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 114
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
219% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 22.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback