Lenovo 10A90011GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A90011GE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 15:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 364
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 405
Asus(1043 839C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 85 44 58 41 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 477
Write 410
Mixed 365
SusWrite 106
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 16.9
71% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 77
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
13% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$30
424GB free
Firmware: LVD6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 93.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 105
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.2
268% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 0619 SLA302G08-GGNHC 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A90011GE Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10A90011GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $346
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback