Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181209
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 14:12
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 915
81% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,277
79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 117
Parallax 97.3
83% 105 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 96.9
Splatting 101
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1988 764 600 620 583 621 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,572
Write 2078
Mixed 1,449
SusWrite 863
388% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 84.2
278% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 840
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 756
570% 764 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 276%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 PRO Series (TurboPC EX) 256GB
97GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6,144
Write 3,910
Mixed 4,618
1,084% 4,890 MB/s
4K Read 352
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 257
982% 278 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 807
622% 854 MB/s
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB (TurboPC EX)
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 315 323 322 309 322 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 465
Mixed 401
SusWrite 328
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58
195% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB (TurboPC EX)
319GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 454 466 466 444 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 461
Mixed 373
SusWrite 460
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 57.5
190% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 124%
Great: 119%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 USB Device (TurboPC EX) 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 358
Write 51.7
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 45.3
126% 131 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
72% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.3% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback