Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-HD3  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 20:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 550
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 61.2
52% 64.4 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 54.5
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 361
Write 181
Mixed 99.9
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 9.66
57% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 10.4
18% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 93%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
18GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 366
Write 232
Mixed 84.1
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 7.92
57% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 10.3
13% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
696GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 162
Mixed 128
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.27
128% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL Kingston 9905402-532.A00LF 0420 F3-10666CL9-4GBRL Kingston 9905403-803.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-HD3 Builds (Compare 857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback