HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory0.8 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 01 '19 at 01:46
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 79.8
44% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 82.3
8-Core 78.8
11% 80.6 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 47 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.7% Poor
Read 214
Write 52.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 46.8
20% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 6.5
39% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
214GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 121 121 121 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 121
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 KTW149-ELF ID:01 98 KTW149-ELF ID:01 98 KTW149-ELD ID:01 98 KTW149-ELF 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.8% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback