PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68A-D3H-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110419 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 27 '19 at 05:25 |
Run Duration | 208 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
69.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 128 140 140 141 141 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 132 140 143 142 142 MB/s
|
85.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 161 160 160 162 MB/s
|
89.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: CC51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 78 78 79 MB/s
|
70%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 124 130 132 131 130 MB/s
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 5.5 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.3 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 127 130 132 132 131 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD80 EMZZ-00TBGA0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 5.5 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.4 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 104x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 75x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 51x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 26x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $573 |