Asus PRIME B360-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 11:34
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 273
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 834
85% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 65.9
62% 73.1 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 70.5
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 273 275 271 275 276 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 473
Mixed 370
SusWrite 292
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 51.1
174% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 229
206% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
54GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 49 48 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 448
Write 80
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 47.9
36% 169 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 19.3
92% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 46.5
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
202GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 82 83 78 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 51.2
Write 38
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 82
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB
297GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 102 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 101
69% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 63%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 21
Write 13
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 13.2
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 8%
Initio INIC-3609 160GB
149GB free, PID 3940
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 33
Write 39.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 42.2
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
JMicron RAID-1 500GB
415GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.9% Very poor
Read 35
Write 37.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 38.9
48% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B360-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360-PLUS - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback