Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 08:11
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User LAO-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 190
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 464
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 77
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 74.7
63% 76.1 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 73.8
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 89 98 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 154
Write 98.5
Mixed 128
SusWrite 92.3
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 32.2
111% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 111
87% 120 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
125GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58% Above average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 83.2
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 44.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 48
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 7.6 13 13 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 11.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 11.3
22% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 28%
ST750LM0 22 HN-M750MBB 750GB
51GB free, PID 022e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 27
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 28.9
39% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 04CD F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 24GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 20
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback