Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 04:42
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 178
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 487
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 61.9
55% 66.2 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 54.6
51% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 210 206 213 198 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 392
Write 264
Mixed 278
SusWrite 204
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 30.7
116% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 144
126% 188 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73%
Great: 91%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
556GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 136 138 140 138 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 129
Mixed 89
SusWrite 136
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.4
253% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 130 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 127
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 129
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
413GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 72 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 67
Write 70.3
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 71
84% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 11 9.7 9.1 9.1 9.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 76
Write 77
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 11.1
75% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17%
Great: 39%
Sony Micro Vault Mach USB 3.0 16GB-$42
11GB free, PID 05b9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 20.7
29% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $855
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback