Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 165 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 285 38% 284 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 4.08 Parallax 4.44 3% 4.16 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 3.57 Splatting 5.61 4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 414 Write 322 Mixed 207 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 12.6 52% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 78.8 DQ Mixed 41.1 46% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
ST375064 0AS 750GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 232GB free, PID 2351 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 24 23 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 15.3 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 23.4 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
MZNTE512HMJH-000L2 512GBSamsungBench 69%, 1,377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 3 samples	1x
SLA302G08-EDJ1C Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 SLA302G08-EDJ1C Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 12GBUnknownBench 41%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $309