Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '19 at 23:07
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 647
60% 499 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2254 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 74
Parallax 70.3
60% 72.5 fps
MRender 78.7
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 75.3
62% 75.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 489
Write 450
Mixed 322
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 41.5
153% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 216
162% 217 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
25GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 124 131 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 122
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 126
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
99GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 74 75 73 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 74.3
Write 69.2
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 73.1
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback