Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 20:36
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 223
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 622
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2254 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.3% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 73
62% 75.6 fps
MRender 79.6
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 77.3
63% 76.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-000L1 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT03L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 445
Mixed 309
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 40.6
150% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 218
159% 207 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 105%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
24GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 122 130 123 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 118
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 126
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
99GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 71 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 71
Write 71
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 71.6
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
377GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 77 80 80 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 78
Write 71.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 78.5
83% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 12GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback