Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '19 at 13:03
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 86.8
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 106
53% 82 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 210
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E224) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 44.1
29% 37.5 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 36.7
26% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGYA0201
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 57.8
Mixed 97.4
21% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 10
38% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 44%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
123GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 153 52 98 65 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 239
Write 206
Mixed 123
SusWrite 100
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 10.3
54% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.6
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 20.6
16% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
12GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 70 69 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 70.2
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 69.6
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
2GB free
Firmware: 4.CCB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 57 55 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 25
Mixed 39
SusWrite 54.8
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback