Asus P5KC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KC  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080625
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 09:51
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9770
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 103
52% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 205
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E224) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 9.69
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 29.9
Splatting 37.2
27% 31.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+ Series 128GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGYA0201
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 164
Write 131
Mixed 133
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 14.6
53% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 6.3
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 10.7
8% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 44%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
188GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 174 30 61 114 147 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.6% Below average
Read 232
Write 199
Mixed 164
SusWrite 111
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 19.6
66% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 20.5
16% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
8GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 32 17 15 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 66.5
Write 81.6
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 32.5
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
2GB free
Firmware: 4.CCB
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.6
Write 57.3
Mixed 46.1
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB
8GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 3.3 2.7 2.9 2.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.8
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 2.9
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 30%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-60U6AA0 500GB
5GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 22.2
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback