Monster ABRA A5 V13.4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V13.4  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard Standard
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180502
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '19 at 16:15
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 632
68% 541 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 142 144 140 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 399
Write 374
Mixed 166
SusWrite 140
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 15.5
83% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 144
112% 155 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
159GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 67 68 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 71
Write 72.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 66.7
43% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2666A 04CB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.7
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V13.4 Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Monster ABRA A5 V13.4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback