Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-9620P APU (2016 M.BR) 6,180 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 89.9 38% 62 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 151 21% 154 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 6,195 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 122E) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.2711.0 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.17 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 9.66 5% 8.03 fps	Gravity 6.5 Splatting 5.61 5% 6.05 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 902GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 399 386 396 416 385 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Read 427 Write 423 Mixed 391 SusWrite 389 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 43.5 141% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 231 172% 229 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 12GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.1% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.1 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 7 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	57x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	55x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 6,884 samples	8x

SSD
SD9SB8W128G1102 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 107 samples	10x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	9x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	5x

RAM
K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 22%, 816 samples	16x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Micron MT40A1G8WE-083E:B 12GBHynixBench 21%, 222 samples	13x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 2,704 samples	11x