Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 18:24
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 920
92% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,245
77% 1,245 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Asus(1043 8661) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 130
Parallax 129
111% 132 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 90.7
85% 106 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 196 199 205 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 437
Write 222
Mixed 159
SusWrite 201
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 26.9
124% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 36.5
81% 168 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
236GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1906 835 568 580 582 588 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,568
Write 2,198
Mixed 1,586
SusWrite 843
401% 1,799 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 93.5
313% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 1,326
DQ Mixed 606
680% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 315%
Great: 340%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.2 3.1 3 3 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 3
3% 3.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 8%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
820GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 114 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62% Good
Read 141
Write 116
Mixed 85
SusWrite 112
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
217% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 62%
Great: 65%
WD My Book 500GB
349GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 40.8
Write 36
Mixed 28
SusWrite 40.1
49% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 21.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $926
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback