Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '19 at 18:19
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$192
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 138
2-Core 296
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 975
97% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389
Asus(1043 8661) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 152
Parallax 161
131% 158 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 137
Splatting 99.1
109% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 199 222 220 168 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 432
Write 239
Mixed 161
SusWrite 193
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 23.7
116% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 32.1
93% 203 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
390GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2197 662 621 621 621 621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 2329
Mixed 1,601
SusWrite 891
408% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 94.3
322% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 1,354
DQ Mixed 86.8
398% 889 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 311%
Great: 340%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 7.7
Mixed 2.5
5% 5.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
816GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 113 111 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 144
Write 116
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 113
149% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.9
233% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 21.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 25.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $930
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback