ECS GeForce 8000 series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS GeForce 8000 series  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090519
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 09:16
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 64.4
40% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 71.9
8-Core 74.8
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 79.2
5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
(pe64) ATI Radeon HD 5450/6230/6250/6290/6350/7350/8350/AMD Radeon R5 220
Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1014.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.54 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.26
1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 26 24 28 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 34
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 25.7
23% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 30%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
217GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 83 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 99.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 86.1
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD21G8002 Samsung M3 78T2863QZS-CF7 PSD21G8002 Samsung M3 78T2863QZS-CF7 4GB
333, 333, 333, 333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GeForce 8000 series Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS GeForce 8000 series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback