TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 80RU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80RU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 700-15ISK
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '19 at 16:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 180
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 540
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 380A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4526
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 16
Parallax 5.72
5% 9.31 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 12.3
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.82%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QBXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 141 136 151 137 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 694
Write 156
Mixed 200
SusWrite 144
65% 299 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 28
155% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.1
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 27.2
33% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 85.3%
 Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ02ABF100 1TB-$55
162GB free
Firmware: DS0C1E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 39 29 35 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 56.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 47
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 29.7%
 Great: 61%
ST5000LM 000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 94 92 103 129 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
Read 127
Write 63.7
Mixed 77
SusWrite 112
123% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 57.3%
 Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 73.3%
 Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 80RU Builds (Compare 1,457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80RU

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples978x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples478x
Core i3-6100HIntelBench 56%, 313 samples1x
GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples989x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples468x
SSD
MZVLV256HCHP-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 127%, 2,256 samples102x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples80x
MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 98%, 1,748 samples77x
RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples173x
M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 20,956 samples136x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples97x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback