Zoostorm 7200-5322A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-5322A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A68HM-PLUS
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '19 at 01:00
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 132
52% 88 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 199
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1275 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 37.7
25% 33.8 fps
MRender 31.7
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 35.2
27% 32.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 437 441 444 430 338 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 443
Mixed 404
SusWrite 409
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 45.7
157% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 249
187% 250 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
736GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 121
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 112
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 84%
WDC WDS1 20G1G0A-00SS50 120GB
112GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.68 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 BRAP51288G16C1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 14
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5322A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-5322A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback