Zoostorm 7200-5322A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Zoostorm 7200-5322A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK A68HM-PLUS
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175 12,658 User benchmarks, average bench 43% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 125 53% 87.6 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 208 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1275 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Lighting 30.5 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 38.5 25% 33.5 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 29.7 Splatting 34.9 26% 31.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 479 483 480 412 349 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 736GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 111 113 112 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 135 Write 132 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 112 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 84%
WDC WDS1 20G1G0A-00SS50 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 112GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 BRAP51288G16C1600 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 14 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.9 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5322A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm 7200-5322A

CPU
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	1x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	1x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 28%, 2,135 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16