User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF79
Memory8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 02:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 72.2
43% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 70.2
8-Core 69.8
9% 70 Pts
64-Core 70
4% 70 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1428 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.2% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 77.2
48% 69.5 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 60
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1676GSX 160GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 38 30 29 39 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 59.5
Write 60
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 33.4
38% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS723225L9A 250GB
104GB free
Firmware: FCDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 52.8
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 54.1
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback