User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF79
Memory8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 21:25
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 90.8
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 106
54% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 105
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 2060 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 84.5
49% 73.6 fps
MRender 74.5
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 62
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1676GSX 160GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 29 31 28 28 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 19
Write 33.7
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 31.3
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS723225L9A 250GB
104GB free
Firmware: FCDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 55
Write 52.9
Mixed 33
SusWrite 54
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback