User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF79
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 02:39
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 120
54% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 121
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 65.4
42% 63.1 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 60.9
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1676GSX 160GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 49 44 47 47 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 45.6
Write 37.5
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 47
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS723225L9A 250GB
104GB free
Firmware: FCDO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 56 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 56.6
Write 53.9
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 55.3
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 6.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback