Asus H81M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-D  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '19 at 08:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 390
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 31
19% 28.2 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 33.7
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fuhler D900 S120GB 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 107 59 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 418
Write 359
Mixed 351
SusWrite 94.7
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 49.3
165% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 231
189% 269 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
100GB free
Firmware: 6E.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 59 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 64
Mixed 52
SusWrite 60
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-D8KQ9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback