MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 23:08
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.7% Good
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 188
66% 141 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 695
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 1,049
70% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$369
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Lighting 305
Reflection 289
Parallax 302
79% 299 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 292
Splatting 229
78% 241 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 268 264 259 257 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 483
Mixed 402
SusWrite 282
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 53.1
179% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 356
270% 363 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
59GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 102 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 484
Write 107
Mixed 155
SusWrite 107
46% 213 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 10.6
53% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 64%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 198 200 198 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 159
Mixed 86
SusWrite 199
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 36
Write 20.3
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 19.4
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.6
145% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 29.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 20.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 15,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $1,043
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback