Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 15:31
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 907
82% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,244
77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB; Palit Gamingpro OC
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 230
Parallax 253
138% 218 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 218
Splatting 137
162% 207 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 137%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 358 369 389 383 388 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,516
Write 548
Mixed 593
SusWrite 374
166% 758 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 56.5
202% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 505
365% 479 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 167%
Great: 241%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
142GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 205 209 214 215 215 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 316
Mixed 331
SusWrite 210
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 48.7
167% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 51.9
123% 257 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
7GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 398
Write 308
Mixed 263
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 40.1
144% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 43.4
89% 173 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
676GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 82.7
Mixed 58
SusWrite 105
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
220GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 96 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.7
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 95.6
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.8 4 4.1 4.2 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 18
Write 14.5
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 4.1
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
158% 3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU48N26-FFFHM 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 53.9
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 49.4
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 125%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $948
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback