Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 19:44
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 868
80% 668 Pts
64-Core 1,232
76% 1,232 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 215
Parallax 225
158% 212 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 195
Splatting 129
146% 186 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 143%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 357 369 389 389 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1446
Write 624
Mixed 611
SusWrite 377
168% 764 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 56.2
199% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 91.4
167% 339 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 163%
Great: 241%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
103GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 204 209 214 214 194 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 315
Mixed 324
SusWrite 207
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 48.3
165% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 48.9
122% 256 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
7GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 397
Write 307
Mixed 266
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 39.7
141% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 42.8
88% 173 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
676GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 104 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 82
Mixed 63
SusWrite 105
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
249GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 93 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 94
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 95.2
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 15.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 4.2
17% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.4
161% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU48N26-FFFHM 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 54.3
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 49.1
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 23.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 125%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback