Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 207
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 895
81% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 51.2
45% 56.3 fps
MRender 78.1
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 71.3
56% 68 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 374 373 387 408 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 625
Mixed 613
SusWrite 390
169% 765 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 57
200% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 322
283% 429 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 165%
Great: 241%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
103GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 208 207 202 178 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 315
Mixed 328
SusWrite 194
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 48.1
164% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 52
123% 256 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
7GB free
Firmware: MU02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 408
Write 309
Mixed 268
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 39.6
142% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 42.9
88% 173 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 105%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
676GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 85.5
Mixed 62
SusWrite 106
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
249GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 95 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 97.5
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 98
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 18.2
Write 13.8
Mixed 15
SusWrite 4.2
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.6
170% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU48N26-FFFHM 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 54.5
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 49.2
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 23.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback