Asrock Q1900M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Q1900M  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 26 '19 at 02:08
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 23
2-Core 45.8
32% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 91.5
8-Core 91.6
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 1
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 178 191 190 196 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 195
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 190
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
382GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 69.3
Write 70.3
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 103
55% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
172GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 67.5
Write 69.3
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 99.1
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 68%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB
342GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 70.8
Write 72.8
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 67.3
90% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.6
292% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback