MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 12:51
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 106
54% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 191
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1433 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.7
19% 21.3 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 24
Splatting 18.5
18% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron 64GB-$75
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 84 65 51 50 48 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 228
Write 129
Mixed 107
SusWrite 66.2
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 13.4
58% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 20.7
24% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 70%
WD WD6400AARS-00Y5B1 640GB
231GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 74 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 96.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 75.9
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-2GBXH0 F3-10666CL7-2GBXH0 4GB
1413, 1413 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback