Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '19 at 02:41
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 139
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 395
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 87
30% 63.3 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 64
Splatting 55.7
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
73GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 96 98 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 216
Write 180
Mixed 65
SusWrite 97.3
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 10.6
44% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.7
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 10.4
9% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$23
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 54 53 52 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 34
Write 54.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 52.6
31% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2
369% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 64%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
721GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 95 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 96.8
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 97
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
95GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 57 55 55 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 55.9
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80
230GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 42 41 40 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 31.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 39.5
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 51%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
54GB free, PID 0250
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 11 11 7.3 6.9 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 17.3
Mixed 14
SusWrite 8.8
20% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 83%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
346GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.7 5 4.8 5.5 7.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
283GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 5.7 7.2 6.7 7.6 8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 20%
NORELSYS 106X 2TB
2TB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 14.5
28% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback