Gigabyte GA-H61N-D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61N-D2V  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2020 @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 93.8
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 157
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 156
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.56
2% 1.88 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 4
3% 3.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 99 126 148 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 153
Write 142
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 106
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61N-D2V Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61N-D2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback