Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 11 '19 at 14:20
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 79.8
46% 69 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 107
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.23
Parallax 1.47
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 102 103 94 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 119
Write 122
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 99.1
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 103%
GENPLUS USB-MSDC DISK A 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 1
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 1.8
2% 1.58 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback