Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 55.6
2-Core 101
42% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 125
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 21.7
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 20
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 14.5
14% 18 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$35
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 183 184 194 191 195 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 392
Write 227
Mixed 173
SusWrite 190
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 28.6
102% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 208
159% 216 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$69
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 137 134 139 142 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 131
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 136
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
870GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 158 142 158 149 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 164
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 150
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback