Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemSamsung 700Z3C/700Z5C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3C/700Z5C
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '19 at 15:36
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 433
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2618
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.73
Parallax 3
3% 3.91 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.44 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 456 448 455 456 455 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 453
Mixed 435
SusWrite 454
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 39.6
127% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 41.7
122% 262 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 029E CMSX8GX3M1A1600C10 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback