MSI B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B53
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 53.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 265
79% 151 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 844
79% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 117
Parallax 103
94% 112 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 109
Splatting 93.6
80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 130 150 80 67 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 302
Write 322
Mixed 7
SusWrite 115
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 6.6
16% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 55%
Spcc Solid State Disk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 168 169 166 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 171
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53) Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback