Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '19 at 02:13
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 515
69% 514 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2404 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.4% Good
Lighting 82.5
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 73.3
67% 79.5 fps
MRender 84.7
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 77.8
65% 79.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 322 295 310 275 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 448
Write 410
Mixed 230
SusWrite 309
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 32.5
122% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 126
131% 216 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
801GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 202 203 202 202 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 151
Mixed 73
SusWrite 199
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST31000526SV 1TB
213GB free
Firmware: CV15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 83 84 78 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 80.2
Write 79.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 81
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
621GB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 104 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 103
113% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 137 137 121 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 141
Write 150
Mixed 20
SusWrite 122
141% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 2TB
662GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 80 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 82.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 79
99% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback