Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 01:49
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 499
66% 495 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2396 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Lighting 82.3
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 72.6
67% 79.4 fps
MRender 83.8
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 77.8
63% 77.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 309 358 320 308 329 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 455
Write 400
Mixed 220
SusWrite 332
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 28.3
128% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 127
110% 161 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
801GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 199 202 202 200 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 151
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 200
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST31000526SV 1TB
213GB free
Firmware: CV15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 68.2
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
621GB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 103 103 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 99
Write 102
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 102
113% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 138 136 134 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 138
Write 148
Mixed 20
SusWrite 135
145% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 2TB
662GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 79 80 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 80.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 78.7
98% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback