Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '19 at 06:06
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 452
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2404 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24% Poor
Lighting 15.1
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 75.1
12% 58.1 fps
MRender 82.2
Gravity 3
Splatting 79.7
47% 55 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 24%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 331 256 311 305 329 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 466
Write 360
Mixed 242
SusWrite 303
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 28.2
123% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 125
131% 219 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
801GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 200 200 202 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 196
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 200
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST31000526SV 1TB
213GB free
Firmware: CV15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 63
SusWrite 68.2
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
621GB free, PID a00a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 104 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 102
113% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 137 136 120 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 145
Write 149
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 122
142% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
352GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 69 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 68.2
114% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 2TB
662GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 30
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 78.9
71% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback